🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial action to ban social networking access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves around the globe. Officials, child protection groups, and guardians are monitoring closely to see if this approach will set a precedent for other nations.

European Trend

Throughout Europe, a growing number of countries are considering parallel measures.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the leader declaring that mobile devices and apps are "stealing our kids' innocence". The policy may be formalized soon.
• The Norwegian government is set to implement a age restriction of 15, citing the need to shield the young from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to authenticate the identity and age of social media account holders. The media minister have stated that an Australia-style ban is "one of the options on the table".
• In Spain, the president has asked the legislature to enact a law raising the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a similar step, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in the Netherlands has advised parents to block their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has passed a non-binding resolution demanding a ban for minors unless guardian approval is provided. While it warns of the "compulsive" design of these apps, the step does not establish mandatory rules.

"An effective age limit is a solid starting point," stated a leading European lawmaker driving the measure.

The UK: A Watchful Stance

In the UK, the leadership has not ruled out a potential ban, arguing that "nothing is discarded" but insisting any action must be "supported by conclusive data".

Previously, support gathered behind a legislative effort to enact limits on social media use by minors, but it was eventually modified. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the topic.

Charities have expressed warnings. A prominent charity set up by the relatives of a young person who was lost after being exposed to harmful platform posts argues that a simple age ban might not improve online safety and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of risk when users reach the legal age.

"This ban is a answer to the failure of the social media companies to create tools that are appropriate and fit for minors," stated a leading child protection advocate.

America: A State-by-State Landscape

Across America, action is primarily unfolding at the state level due to federal stalemate.

• The state of Utah requires parental consent for minors to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has passed a measure barring those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a rule limiting under-16s to one hour of social media use per day, with extra time dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed laws demanding guardian approval for teenagers to open social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from various individuals to follow Australia's lead, a nationwide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Global Perspectives

Apart from the West, other states are similarly taking action.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, international agencies take a more nuanced stance. The UN children's agency has advised that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "may even prove counterproductive". The agency highlights that social networks can be a "lifeline" for isolated young people and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to prioritize child safeguards.

Even as this worldwide debate continues, the steps of the Australian government and several other countries show that states globally are no longer willing to stand by for platforms to self-regulate.